Jeremy Dietz energy.environment.business

Shifting Sands?

“Have you been to the oilsands? How did you get there? The camera you used what is it made from? You don’t mention anything about reclamation and the replanting of forest.”
- Chris (User Comment – Rethink Alberta Website)

Editor’s Note: Rethink Alberta has since removed the user-comments section of its website. It remains unclear if this was in response to the negative backlash pointed out below.

It’s starting look like the PR battle over the oil sands may be starting to shift – if ever so slightly. Those of you who follow me in the the social media sphere know that a lot my focus is honed in on the oil sands and their surrounding issues. A great deal of my free time is spent reading up on the oil sands and hearing what others have to say about the controversial resource.

For the most part, the vast majority of the internet’s tweets, blogs and message board comments have focused almost exclusively on the oil sand’s negative repercussions. Most observers would find it hard to deny that it has been a one-sided conversation it the social media arena.
The first indication (at least to me) that this online debate was evolving beyond its lopsidedness was when I scanned through the comments on an NRDC anti-oil sands blog post. I was amazed to find that the vast majority of the people lending their voice to the debate were not NRDC supporters, but were pro-oil sands readers. Furthermore, these comments severely out-numbered those left by the anti-oil sands online community. I was left wondering where this community – this tribe – had come from. A few questions to others in twittersphere confirmed that they had as little an idea as I did.

I initially dismissed the whole incident as an anomaly until I heard about Corporate Ethics‘ new ‘Rethink Alberta’ campaign.  After visiting their site and scanning the user comments, I was once again amazed to see the variety of posted opinions. Many of them focused again on defending the oil sands. Not only that, the pro-oil sands comments (as of this date) seem to outnumber the anti-0il sands comments on a forum designed to bludgeon the province and resource.

So what does this all mean? Well, it appears as if an organic community is starting to mobilize online. A community that doesn’t seem to be sponsored by Big Oil or the Alberta government. And if this trend continues, the #oilsands twitter hash tag and message board comments are about to get a lot more interesting.

It’s starting to look like Big Green may have to begin girding for a fight in a domain that it has so far dominated.

About Jeremy

I'm Jeremy and this is my blog. Have a look around and let me know what you think.

9 Responses to “Shifting Sands?”

  • [...] Very interesting blog post by Jeremy Dietz about the shift in user comments. Posted in Uncategorized Cancel [...]

  • Did you really just say Big Green non-ironically?

    Come on dude. Let’s not devolve into Andrew Breitbart territory.

  • [...] Jeremy Dietz, a Calgary-based professional communicator, shed light on a recent trend. His post, Shifting Sands?, talks about the emergence of an Oil Sands Tribe –  an online community of people that [...]

  • Good post Jeremy – in fact, you made me come out of my self-imposed exile to write about this very post. Good stuff.

    An Oil Sands Tribe: I Like It – http://wp.me/pRVoX-7R

  • Nice catch, it will be interesting to watch.

    As @ghoberg observed on twitter, how do you know this is not an astroturfing effort? Has anyone looked up IP addresses, or any such thing? The Alberta government has committed millions of dollars to selling the tarsands, surely, an underground PR campaign on blogs/twitter could not cost much.

    Has

  • Yeah, that’s a tough call. No way to be certain. My gut feeling is that it’s organic because the oil sands industry has shown virtually no online initiative in the past – leaving most social media efforts to CAPP and their somewhat limited resources. The same goes for the government of Alberta – there is an online presence there, but this effort doesn’t seem to be in keeping with what we’ve seen from them in the past.

    Unfortunately, checking IP addresses is beyond my technical know how, but I’d be very interested to see if someone could check that.

  • Well speaking for myself, I don’t work for the Oil and Gas industry but I spoke out against the ad in the comments section due to the misleading information in the ad and the wrong approach it uses. The ad was heavily slanted and I laughed at the “can be seen from space” comment. Thanks to Google Earth even my house can be seen from space now.

  • Jeremy,

    I’m one of Stephan’s good buddies and I read your stuff from time to time because I’m interested in the subject matter. I’d be curious to hear your take on the following article from the globe which you may be aware of: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/the-energy-bridge-to-china/article1650078/

    In my view, we have to green light the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline ASAP so we can diversify our export market. It would also render any hair-brained election season threats from supposedly environmentally conscious US politicians completely limp. I think we’re in a prime position to play the US and China off each other to Canada’s benefit once a viable pipeline system is in place. Chief and Council in First Nation communities will no doubt come around to Enbridge once the price is right. I think a 10% stake is more than generous, though. I’d be interested to hear any thoughts you have on the Asian gateway pipeline proposition. I don’t know why there’s any hesitation, this thing is clearly a winner.

  • Hey Dan,

    Good to hear from you and thanks for checking out the blog. I wish more Canadians took an interest in this stuff – energy and the world’s growing need for it are huge issues for our country.

    I agree that from a geo-political standpoint it makes complete sense to move ahead with Gateway. It’s no secret that increasing demand would bode well for Canada, which is becoming increasingly dependent on the oil sands revenue.

    What I’m not so sure about is Aboriginal and environmental buy-in. Skepticism of big-business is at an all time high (think wall street and BP), so I think opposition to the oil sands risks spilling over into mainstream opinion. Ignatieff has already come out and said he doesn’t want to see oil tankers off the coast of the Pacific Northwest. Coming from Ontario, you likely have a better handle than I do on what people in the rest of the country think.

    That being said, my gut feeling is that when there is this much money involved their is usually a way to make things work. Either way, it’ll be interesting to see how things progress.

    Anyway, thanks again for checking out the blog. Be sure to stop by every so often.